Maybe it's just us but we swear we had deja vu after reading this articleGoogle News about now ex-Mayor Spitzer. Isn't this eerily similar to Bill Clinton's predicament? Well OK there was one difference: money for career advancement. Why didn't Spitzer deny accusations to the end? More importantly how did Clinton Get away with a similar predicament?
The only benefactors, republicans, enjoy a breather from "The Finger of Infidelity". We just can't see how this would have any real difference in the presidential race. In other words, this shouldn't give the Republicans any real advantage. So, Why is it receiving so much press? Outside of New York; who cares?
Most importantly, Spitzer/Clinton: what's the difference?
No comments:
Post a Comment